"Literature can be the site of self-discovery and intellectual growth for adolescents if we, as their literature teachers, help create the spaces, both in the classroom and out, for them to flourish as readers and thinkers."
Appleman gives 6 pieces of advice to readers in this chapter. Which advice weighs heaviest on you and your personal beliefs about teaching reading to adolescents?
My favorite is, "No one is too cool or too old to be touched by the magic of having someone read aloud to him or her." The best way to hook a reader into a new book is with the first chapter. That's when they hook themselves, so it helps to do a few read alouds. Check out the first chapter of Shattering Glass, Water for Elephants, or Inexcusable. Fill your classroom with the wondrous words of these writers and watch your students fight over who gets to take the book with them. No one is beyond being read to. Not even high schoolers.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Monday, October 20, 2008
Can we read today?
If you had to pick one, what would be your all time favorite book? Why that book?
And, two, how can you share your life as a reader with your students?
And, two, how can you share your life as a reader with your students?
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Transcending Bias Through Reader Response
"Rosenblatt's theory may have been developed to assist students to become more active readers and participants in their learning, but the theory does not end with the students. For teachers, reader response continues to run deep. ... It reminds us that...we are agents of change and, to be successful facilitators, we too must create change in our lives."
I was moved by the story of Erik and his response to the novel. It showcases reader response and the powerful effects it can have on readers. I doubt that in the public education classroom we can have such a revelation---if it did happen, it would only happen after a solid year of trust and community building. But other small revelations can occur in responses to literature. Our relationships with the characters can bring us to share with our classmates and it can most defintely aid in our comprehension of the text.
This is reader response. This is what Rosenblatt meant. What we get out of a text is dependent of what we bring to it. Erik's response to the novel was stronger because of the way he related to Eric, the main character. Even with this article, I knew the story and brought that with me. It aided in my comprehension and made the reading of the article richer.
I was moved by the story of Erik and his response to the novel. It showcases reader response and the powerful effects it can have on readers. I doubt that in the public education classroom we can have such a revelation---if it did happen, it would only happen after a solid year of trust and community building. But other small revelations can occur in responses to literature. Our relationships with the characters can bring us to share with our classmates and it can most defintely aid in our comprehension of the text.
This is reader response. This is what Rosenblatt meant. What we get out of a text is dependent of what we bring to it. Erik's response to the novel was stronger because of the way he related to Eric, the main character. Even with this article, I knew the story and brought that with me. It aided in my comprehension and made the reading of the article richer.
Monday, September 29, 2008
On Reading, Learning to Read, and Effective Reading Instruction
There are several statements in this article from NCTE that ring critical and true with me. The first is, "Learning to read is a life-long process." I think of how I have changed as a reader over many years. My habits have changed, my tastes have changed, and my abilities have changed. I am more able to comprehend complex text than I was as a younger student. My abilities have matured.
The second statement is, "The more children interact with spoken and written language, the better readers they become." Studies have shown how many words the average student comes across depending on the amount of time that he/she reads. It is vital that, as high school teachers, we work to make up some of the time that they have missed. Yet, I think back on my classes that I taught, and I'm not sure how much reading was going on. Were my students playing the same game I did and waiting for me to tell them? How are we encouraging reading habits and text interactions? How are we exposing our children to more words?
Lastly, the word "authentic" is most important to me. As I read more, as I study more, and as I work in more classrooms, I see that we have to relate everything to our students' lives and those lives are changing more and more every day. The world that these students live in does not look anything like the world that I grew up in and I can only imagine how different it is from my parents' generation.
What lines from the article hit home most with you? Do you agree or disagree? Why? How are we implementing the policies that promote learning to read at our school and in our classes?
Remember to post prior to our next class meeting, October 20th.
The second statement is, "The more children interact with spoken and written language, the better readers they become." Studies have shown how many words the average student comes across depending on the amount of time that he/she reads. It is vital that, as high school teachers, we work to make up some of the time that they have missed. Yet, I think back on my classes that I taught, and I'm not sure how much reading was going on. Were my students playing the same game I did and waiting for me to tell them? How are we encouraging reading habits and text interactions? How are we exposing our children to more words?
Lastly, the word "authentic" is most important to me. As I read more, as I study more, and as I work in more classrooms, I see that we have to relate everything to our students' lives and those lives are changing more and more every day. The world that these students live in does not look anything like the world that I grew up in and I can only imagine how different it is from my parents' generation.
What lines from the article hit home most with you? Do you agree or disagree? Why? How are we implementing the policies that promote learning to read at our school and in our classes?
Remember to post prior to our next class meeting, October 20th.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Welcome, study group members!
This year, the professional reading blog will be used for responses to study group readings. I look forward to reading your ideas!
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Final Survey
I just want some information about the process of blogging--since this is our first experiment with it. You can post your responses or place them in my mailbox--whichever you are most comfortable with.
1) We have used book clubs in the past at NHS for professional development. How would you compare and rate this one? Did you prefer the blog or would you rather meet face to face?
2) Would you be willing to participate in a blog again?
3) What topics would you like to see addressed in book clubs?
4) Would you be willing to lead a blog book study?
1) We have used book clubs in the past at NHS for professional development. How would you compare and rate this one? Did you prefer the blog or would you rather meet face to face?
2) Would you be willing to participate in a blog again?
3) What topics would you like to see addressed in book clubs?
4) Would you be willing to lead a blog book study?
Ch. 9 Leadership in the PLC
I guess I'll start with Chapter 9, too. I think an important topic was when the author talked about the "learning-centered principal." We are often too focused on the teaching aspect and maybe we overlook the learning, not just for the students but for us as teachers as well. This principal realized the value of learning and told the teachers to focus on the most essential standards. I do think thats a good idea in practice but when our students are tested on the standards, it's hard to overlook a "non-essential" standard. We are having EOC testing now and if you teach an EOC, how can you overlook a standard and then be criticized if your students don't perform well on the EOC? As it stated in the book, it would be great if we could create our own EOC but that's not the case for us so until that happens, I don't see any teacher being able to teach "only the essential standards" because they are all essential since they are all on the EOC.
As for learning, we as teachers can also learn from each other. In the first part of the book, we all read about how we teach with closed doors and don't welcome others into the classroom. But, if we do observe and we do have the PLCs and we do utilize common planning, we all can learn. We want our students to learn... so just as we model SSR, we can model learning.
As for learning, we as teachers can also learn from each other. In the first part of the book, we all read about how we teach with closed doors and don't welcome others into the classroom. But, if we do observe and we do have the PLCs and we do utilize common planning, we all can learn. We want our students to learn... so just as we model SSR, we can model learning.
Ch. 8 PLC
Hey Dianne. I'm thinking you are wanting us to take the initiative and start our own posts now? : ) I know I have no idea if this is going to post or not but I figured I'd go ahead and say a few things about Chapter 8. So, here goes......I do agree that the Professional Learning Communities are more effective than traditional staff developments. For one, there are less people in the PLCs and I think it makes for a better atmosphere. I know in our faculty meetings and staff developments there are usually bigger crowds and usually the same people are the ones that are more vocal. The smaller groups will allow for more in-depth discussions and it allows for everyone to have a say without creating a LONG meeting. Each PLC can have a common goal. The smaller groups also allow for the individual teachers to share their experiences, and we can have follow up and reflection meetings which will be valuable, too. The PLCs seem to encourage more discussion and I believe the PLC can be effective if a common goal is set and everyone in the group is on board for the same purpose.
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Chapter 7: Literacy Education
There's a myth in public schools that just because some of us chose English as a major, we must know all about how to teach reading and writing and therefore it should be left up to us. But Schmoker paints a very realistic picture of the college background of English majors--there are classes on Romanticism and Modernism, British lit and American lit, and even AIDS in literature. There are some great classes, but none of them prepare us for how to deal with the student that has made it to the 11th grade and still can't write (or simply won't write) a complete sentence. There's usually one reading class for education majors--Reading in the Content Area--but its not necessarily taught by someone trained in literacy itself. As an English major, I had one class in writing for secondary students, so I can't imagine non-ELA majors had much more. We come to public schools unprepared for what we are going to face, and if Schmoker is hitting the nail on the head, we avoid the situation as much as possible. We don't assign writing to our students. But when you have 150 of them, who has time to assign and grade all that writing?
Instead of examining all the things that are getting in our way of assigning writing to students, let's look closely at what we are doing write and what we might be able to do in the future. This year, sophomores were trained in the HSAP rubric and then graded their own writing in preparation for the test. (I guess we'll see in the fall how successful the experiment was.) What else can we do to move our literacy focus over to incorporate writing? It has to become a community effort, this teaching of reading and writing, if we are to ever see results, so what can we do as a community?
Instead of examining all the things that are getting in our way of assigning writing to students, let's look closely at what we are doing write and what we might be able to do in the future. This year, sophomores were trained in the HSAP rubric and then graded their own writing in preparation for the test. (I guess we'll see in the fall how successful the experiment was.) What else can we do to move our literacy focus over to incorporate writing? It has to become a community effort, this teaching of reading and writing, if we are to ever see results, so what can we do as a community?
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
More on Chapter 6
I apologize for my tardiness and glad to see the conversation has continued without me. I've totally let my writing go the last few weeks and I need to get back on track with everything.
I'm very interested in the section on writing in chapter 6. I've studied writing a good bit this year and I'm intrigued on what it would take to get us to move towards more writing in the classroom. How many of us have writing on major tests? (I actually only have writing in the English classes--very little multiple choice questions.) And why don't we have more writing on major tests? Students can finagle mastery when its "multiple guess", as my father calls it. They can even cover holes in their knowledge with oral answers. But they can't get around it in writing. If you truly want to see if your students get it, have them write it out.
So what can we do to incorporate more writing into our classes? Sizer stated that "writing is the litmus paper of thought...the very center of schooling."
Chapter 6 also talks about talk. How often do students bat around ideas just like adults do? How can we set up this scenario in our classrooms?
Chapter 7 is coming soon...I promise not to fall too far behind! And blue sheets will be coming around the 19th.
I'm very interested in the section on writing in chapter 6. I've studied writing a good bit this year and I'm intrigued on what it would take to get us to move towards more writing in the classroom. How many of us have writing on major tests? (I actually only have writing in the English classes--very little multiple choice questions.) And why don't we have more writing on major tests? Students can finagle mastery when its "multiple guess", as my father calls it. They can even cover holes in their knowledge with oral answers. But they can't get around it in writing. If you truly want to see if your students get it, have them write it out.
So what can we do to incorporate more writing into our classes? Sizer stated that "writing is the litmus paper of thought...the very center of schooling."
Chapter 6 also talks about talk. How often do students bat around ideas just like adults do? How can we set up this scenario in our classrooms?
Chapter 7 is coming soon...I promise not to fall too far behind! And blue sheets will be coming around the 19th.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)